Iphone 12 Pro Max Battery Upgrade
Apple brought out its iPhone 12 Pro Max in October 2020. Landing in our Ultra-Premium segment (above $800), the iPhone brings with it a large half-dozen.7-inch OLED display that supports HDR10 content, and a triple-camera setup (forth with a lidar sensor). Unlike about other phones in our database thus far, however, it does non come with a charger.
We recently tested the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max's battery performance and will relate our most important findings in this review.
Fundamental specifications:
-
- Battery capacity: 3687 mAh
- 20W charger not included
- Wireless charging
- 6.7-inch, 1284 x 2778, 60 Hz OLED display
- Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset, 5G
- Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + half-dozen GB
Nearly DXOMARK Bombardment tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. This article highlights the most important results of our testing. (Meet our introductory and how we test articles for more than details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)
Test summary
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
78
battery
70
Best: Vivo Y72 5G (104)
64
All-time: Samsung Galaxy M51 (96)
68
Best: Samsung Milky way M51 (100)
74
Best: Realme GT Neo 3 (118)
72
Best: Realme GT Neo iii (111)
54
Best: Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro (105)
116
Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro (121)
Position in Global Ranking 27th
3. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
89
seven. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
88
12. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
86
12. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
86
12. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
86
17. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
85
xix. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
84
27. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
78
27. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
78
45. Motorola Moto G9 Ability
lxx
45. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
70
48. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
69
51. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
67
55. Samsung Milky way S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
64
57. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
63
66. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
sixty
66. Samsung Milky way S22 Ultra (Exynos)
60
66. Samsung Milky way A33 5G
lx
71. Samsung Milky way A53 5G
59
75. Samsung Milky way S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
57
76. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
55
78. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
51
79. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
50
83. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
45
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking 3rd
1. Apple iPhone thirteen Pro Max
89
3. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
78
7. Samsung Milky way S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
70
xi. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
64
xiii. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
60
13. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
60
sixteen. Samsung Milky way S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
57
Pros
- Provides 2 days of autonomy in moderate usage (49 hours)
- Considerably lower power consumption (discharge) than the competition
Cons
- Low full charging efficiency
- Very boring charging after eighty% to achieve full battery capacity
With an overall Battery score of 78, the Apple tree iPhone 12 Pro Max puts in a respectable performance that lands it in the tiptop four in our database and so far. While information technology has an average score for Charging, and an to a higher place-average score for Autonomy, information technology is the current score leader for Efficiency thus far (but every bit ever, numbers alone don't quite tell the whole story).
We compared the Apple tree iPhone 12 Pro Max's performance in several central categories with 2 other ultra-premium devices, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon) and the Oppo Find X3 Pro; bombardment chapters, charger, brandish type and resolution, and processor specifications for all three devices are shown in the table below.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max | Samsung Milky way S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon) | Oppo Detect X3 Pro | |
Battery (mAh) | 3687 | 5000 | 4500 |
Charger (W) | 20W | 25W | 65W |
Display blazon | OLED | AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
Resolution | 1284 x 2778 | 1440 x 3200 | 1440 10 3216 |
Processor | Apple tree A14 Bionic | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 |
Autonomy (67)
How long a battery accuse lasts depends not merely on bombardment capacity, merely also other aspects of the phone's hardware and software. The DXOMARK Battery autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: (one) Stationary, (2) On the go, and (3) Calibrated utilize cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of existent-life scenarios.
71h
Calorie-free Usage
Active: 2h30/twenty-four hour period
49h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/solar day
30h
Intense Usage
Agile: 7h/day
At 67, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max's Autonomy score puts it into the upper one-half of devices tested so far (regardless of segment), and is amend than the Autonomy scores for all other ultra-premium smartphones to appointment. Let's now swoop into some specifics.
Stationary
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
seventy
104
Vivo Y72 5G
Best: Vivo Y72 5G (104)
A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user deportment during what nosotros call our "typical usage scenario" (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — iv hours of active use over the grade of a xvi-hour period, plus 8 hours of "slumber." The robot repeats this set of deportment every twenty-four hour period until the device runs out of power.
The Apple tree iPhone 12 Pro Max accomplished an in a higher place-average score of 70 in our stationary TUS testing, again leading all other ultra-premium devices in our database to date, and providing more than 2 days — 61+ hours — of autonomy, some 4.5 hours more than the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon) and virtually exactly more than than 15 hours than the Oppo Discover X3 Pro used in our comparing here.
Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves
On the go
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
64
96
Samsung Milky way M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (96)
Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy considering of extra "hidden" demands, such equally the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network option, for case. DXOMARK Battery experts have the phone outside and perform a precisely defined gear up of activities while post-obit the same iii-hour travel itinerary for each device.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max's on the go score of 64 is only average — a few points behind the Samsung, merely ahead of the Oppo Find X3 Pro past 15 points. The Apple device is meliorate for camera use on the go than both competitors, merely it trails the Samsung just a little in all other activities (telephone calls, GPS, social apps).
Autonomy for on the become use cases (total charge)
Calibrated
Apple tree iPhone 12 Pro Max
68
100
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (100)
For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use instance (such equally gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.
Among the iii ultra-premium devices in this comparison, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max took top honors over the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon) by a few points, and by near 20 points over the Oppo Find X3 Pro, showing ameliorate operation than both in 4G music and video streaming. That said, it was behind the Samsung device for 3G calling and video playback.
Autonomy for calibrated employ cases (full charge)
Charging (74)
The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of ii sub-scores, Full charge and Quick boost. Full charge tests appraise the reliability of the battery ability gauge; mensurate how long it takes to accuse a battery from 0% to fourscore% capacity and from 80 to 100%; and measure out how long and how much ability the battery takes to go from an indicated 100% to an actual full charge. With the phone at different accuse levels (20%, 40%, 60%, eighty%), Quick boost tests measure the corporeality of charge the battery receives afterward beingness plugged in for v minutes.
Wired
Wireless
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has relatively expert charging time (considering the power of its charger) until it reaches lxxx%; later that, it charges very slowly when compared to the Samsung and particularly when compared to the Oppo, for a total charging fourth dimension of 2 hours 27 minutes versus one hour 28 minutes for the Samsung and just under 37 minutes for the Oppo.
Power consumption and battery level during full charge
Power consumption and battery level during wireless full charge
Full accuse
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
74
118
Realme GT Neo three
Best: Realme GT Neo 3 (118)
Although it cannot compete at all with the Find X3 Pro'southward astonishing sub-score of 104 (achieved via its 65W charger), the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max isn't too far behind the Snapdragon version of the Samsung S21 Ultra in our full charge testing. The Apple device takes much longer than the competition to go from 80% to 100% — nearly a full hour versus near 20 minutes for the Samsung (and only about 6 minutes for the Oppo).
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max's wireless charging takes 3 hours 1 minute to charge to 100% (per the device UI) and an boosted 28 minutes to attain full charge capacity, which is nearly twice equally long equally the lightning-fast Oppo Find X3 Pro.
Quick boost
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
72
111
Realme GT Neo 3
Best: Realme GT Neo 3 (111)
Although it comes in terminal among the three devices compared in this review (only only very slightly behind the Samsung), the iPhone 12 Pro Max provides virtually 3.5 hours of autonomy when plugged in at less than 50% power remaining.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max | Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon) | Oppo Discover X3 Pro | ||
Autonomy heave (hh:mm) | 20% | 3:17 | 3:24 | 5:49 |
twoscore% | iii:16 | 3:22 | half dozen:36 | |
60% | 3:03 | 2:54 | 4:40 | |
eighty% | 1:24 | two:11 | 3:25 | |
Percent heave | xx% | viii.2 % | 9.2 % | 18.4 % |
40% | viii.two % | nine.1 % | xx.9 % | |
60% | vii.six % | 7.viii % | 14.7 % | |
80% | 3.v % | five.nine % | ten.8 % | |
Energy consumed | 20% | 1768 mWh | 2279 mWh | 4020 mWh |
40% | 1764 mWh | 2262 mWh | 4563 mWh | |
60% | 1645 mWh | 1950 mWh | 3223 mWh | |
80% | 761 mWh | 1468 mWh | 2360 mWh |
While the Apple device takes a adequately quick 45 seconds to gain one% battery power while gaming at depression bombardment, that's nonetheless a few seconds backside both the Samsung and the Oppo in our testing.
Efficiency (94)
Our Efficiency score comprises 2 sub-scores, Accuse up and Discharge. Accuse upwards is the efficiency of a total accuse (how much energy is drained from the wall outlet vs the energy capacity of the battery, likewise as the efficiency of the charger and its rest consumption). Belch is how much current the smartphone drains from the bombardment when in use (the ratio of battery capacity over autonomy). Better autonomy with a smaller battery means better efficiency.
Accuse upward
Apple tree iPhone 12 Pro Max
54
105
Nubia RedMagic seven Pro
All-time: Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro (105)
While its somewhat small 20W adapter by itself is quite efficient, the Apple device'south overall charging system (which includes not only the charge adapter but also internal smartphone circuits) was one of its merely true weak points, coming in behind not but its Samsung and Oppo rivals in this review, but also behind the majority of devices in our database thus far.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max takes near an 60 minutes to go from 80% to 100%.
Discharge
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
116
121
Apple tree iPhone 13 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone thirteen Pro (121)
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max's 116 points for discharge efficiency towers far above all others in our database thus far, with simply one other device showing a triple-digit score (the Wiko Ability U30 in our Essential segment, with 102 points). It has lower consumption than all devices in both active hours and in the dark, and among its competitors in this review, information technology shows considerably lower consumption than either the Samsung or the Oppo for music and video streaming.
Conclusion
The Apple tree iPhone 12 Pro Max is amidst the tiptop four in our Battery database so far, with good scores in Autonomy, boilerplate in Charging, and an outstanding score for belch in our Efficiency attribute. Where information technology could have done better was in accuse up Efficiency, where its score was among the lowest among all devices tested so far (only 66% charging efficiency).
Source: https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-12-pro-max-battery-review-excellent-consumption-manager/
0 Response to "Iphone 12 Pro Max Battery Upgrade"
Post a Comment